Methodology
- 1 Confirm the decision is a non-approval and note its credit factors and score band.
- 2 Retrieve 12 CFR 1002.9 so the reasons meet the Reg B standard of specific principal reasons.
- 3 Map decision.factors to specific principal reasons in plain language. Each must trace to a factor that actually drove the decision; do not invent, soften, or pad.
- 4 If the decision was score-based, pull the credit report and include the FCRA score disclosure (the score and the key adverse factors).
- 5 Cite the basis: 12 CFR 1002.9, and FCRA 15 U.S.C. 1681m for the score disclosure.
Sandboxed tools
In-process MCP tools only. Built-in tools disabled, settingSources [], permissionMode bypassPermissions. The only ground truth is the tools.
get_credit_report read Grounds the credit score and the bureau's key adverse factors for the FCRA disclosure.
retrieve_reg read 12 CFR 1002.9 Retrieves Reg B 12 CFR 1002.9 to ground the specific-reasons standard.
record_reasons commit Commits the principal reasons + score disclosure. Called exactly once.
Outcome contract
The action taken, the specific Reg B principal reasons (each derived only from the decision's factors), the FCRA score disclosure when score-based, and the citations.
▸ the validated schema (AdverseAction)
type AdverseAction = {
actionTaken: "decline" | "counteroffer"
principalReasons: string[] // specific, only from decision.factors
scoreDisclosure?: { score: number, keyFactors: string[] } // FCRA
basis: string[] // "12 CFR 1002.9", "FCRA 15 U.S.C. 1681m"
} Grounding
Governance seams
The three trust boundaries a runtime governance layer clamps onto. Shown here ungoverned, so you can see exactly what would be inspected, redacted, or blocked.
The Grounds methodology plus the decision (its factors, score band, policy basis) and the retrieved Reg B text.
governor → Pin the reasons to the decision's factors; reject any reason without a source.
The get_credit_report and the retrieve_reg (1002.9) calls.
governor → Require the rule lookup before the reasons are trusted as Reg B-compliant.
The recorded principal reasons and score disclosure written to the case journal.
governor → Block a commit whose reasons do not map to the decision's factors.
The legal standard is specificity: 'credit score below the program minimum' is a reason, 'did not meet our standards' is not. Grounds may not invent or soften a reason, and a prohibited basis is a defect to flag, never a reason to state.
Evals & guardrails
- Score-based decline. Includes the FCRA score disclosure with the key adverse factors and cites 1681m.
- No invented reasons. Every principal reason maps to a factor that actually drove the decision.
Orchestration
- ⇢Fed by the decision on a decline / counteroffer
- ⇢Reasons handed to Plainspeak